<<< Previous | Index | Next >>> |
Introduction
The role of the Bone Marrow Biopsy
Dr Françoise Delacrétaz, Privat-Docent, Institute of Pathology of the University Hospital (CHUV), CH-1011 Lausanne
Optimal Bone Marrow (BM) examination requires both Aspirate (BMA) and Core Biopsy (BMB).
BMA allows refined cytological examination (such as dysplastic changes, Auer rods, ring
sideroblasts) as well as cytochemistry, flow cytometry, cytogenetics and BM cultures.
BMB definitively has some advantages over aspirate : examination of a greater volume
of tissue with preserved architecture, assessment of cellularity and modifications of
stroma and/or osseous trabeculae, detection of compact and/or fibrotic lesions,
identification of granulomas and opportunistic micro-organisms and application of
immunohistochemistry (IHC). BMB is mandatory when aspirate is not obtained ("dry
aspirate" or "dry tap"). Molecular biology can be performed on both
aspirate and biopsy.
The management of BMB requires refined processing so as to allow optimal preservation of
morphological details. Plastic embedding - although expensive - is still advocated by some
groups but most laboratories are now using paraffin-embedding. Both IHC and molecular
biology can be performed on paraffin-embedded material. Gentle decalcification and thin
sections (2-3 mu) are required.
The indications for the combined cyto-histological examination (BM aspirate and biopsy)
can be summarized as follows :
- Lymphomas
- Multiple Myeloma (MM) and other gammopathies
- Chronic Myeloproliferative Diseases (MPD)
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)
- Acute leukaemia (AL)
- Search for metastases
- Search for infectious processes (granulomas)
- Unexplained cytopenia
Guidelines for BMB examination are presented on Table 1.
BM examination is an important procedure in the diagnosis and management of patients with
lymphoma . The role of BM biopsy in lymphomas can be viewed as follows : assessment of
initial diagnosis, staging of an already identified tumour, evaluation of residual
haemopoiesis, patient follow-up and detection of residual disease after treatment.
Different patterns of BM infiltration are described in lymphoma: nodular paratrabecular,
nodular random, interstitial, diffuse, and intrasinusoidal.
Nodular involvement is the most common pattern. Interstitial infiltration is usually
associated with generalized BM involvement, even though normal haematopoietic tissue and
fat are not greatly compromised. Intrasinusoidal infiltration (marginal zone lymphoma,
gamma-delta T cell lymphoma) may be difficult to appreciate on routinely stained sections
without the aid of immunohistochemical stains. Lymphoma infiltration may be fibrotic and
compact, so that aspirate is often not representative. Bilateral biopsy is recommended by
some authors.
A panel of antibodies (Ab) reactive on paraffin sections is available. The most commonly
used Ab are presented on Table 2. Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry or Fluorescent
Activated Cell Sorter (FACS) is an important advantage of BM aspirate over biopsy, if
enough cells of interest are present in the BMA material. It is particularly useful for
the characterization and classification of small B-cell lymphomas according to the
REAL/WHO scheme (Table 3).
The usefulness of molecular biology for diagnosis and follow-up of lymphomas has been
reported by several authors.
For proper management of the patient, an integrative approach of all available data is
necessary - i.e. peripheral blood and BM morphology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), flow
cytometry, molecular biology and clinical data.
The frequency of BM involvement in lymphoma depends on the histological types and
immunophenotypes.
Among B-cell lymphomas, 3 groups can be distinguished.
1) B-cell lymphoma with constant BM involvement:
Chronic Lymphocyte Leukaemia (B-CLL), Prolymphocytic Leukaemia (B-PLL), Hairy Cell Disease
(HCD).
2) B-cell lymphoma with a high frequency of BM involvement:
Immunocytoma (IC), Follicular (FL), Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), lymphoblastic lymphoma
3) B-cell lymphoma with a low frequency of BM involvement:
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the REAL/WHO classification (high-grade category in the
Kiel classification) and Burkitt's lymphoma.
In category 3), disseminated disease with or without BM involvement represents a poor
prognostic factor. The marrow is infiltrated in 15-30 % of cases in large B-cell
lymphomas. In cases presenting with interstitial and/or minor marrow involvement, tumour
cells may be overlooked if IHC is not applied.
T-cell and/or histiocyte-rich B-cell lymphomas are characterized by the presence of
reactive cells, sometimes in considerable number, and may be confused with a reactive
process, Hodgkin's disease or T-cell lymphoma, if IHC is not performed
Most patients with Peripheral T-cell lymphomas, unspecified and angioimmunoblastic T-cell
lymphoma present with generalized disease. BM involvement represents a poor prognostic
factor. The diagnosis of a T-cell neoplasm on BM biopsy may be a challenge for the
haematopathologist. A biopsy from another site (lymph node) is often necessary to
establish the diagnosis.
In contrast to B-cell lymphomas, non specific reactive changes are common features in
T-cell lymphomas. They are probably induced by a variety of cytokines produced by
neoplastic T-cells. These changes may be very prominent and obscure the neoplastic
process. Tumour cells constitute only a minor part of an infiltrate including lymphocytes,
plasma cells, histiocytes (occasionally granulomas), macrophages, neutrophils,
eosinophils, increased vascularity, fibrosis, and necrosis.
According to our experience and results, TCR- g PCR represents an additional helpful tool
for the detection of monoclonality and diagnosis of T-cell lymphomas in BM biopsies.
BM involvement has been reported in 7-30 % of cases Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL).
BM infiltration is indicative of worse prognosis. In some cases, the pattern of
infiltration is interstitial with isolated lymphoma cells or very small clusters of tumour
cells. The lymphoma infiltration may be overlooked on HE or Giemsa sections and the
detection of tumour cells is significantly higher when IHC with CD30 Ab is employed.
In Hodgkin's disease , BMA is not representative and BMB is mandatory since the tumour
infiltration is usually heterogeneous and classically associated with severe fibrosis and
inflammation. Blocks should be cut at multiple levels.
The most frequent immunoproliferative diseases are Multiple Myeloma (MM), Monoclonal
Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS), lymphoplasmocytic lymphoma (Immunocytoma).
In Multiple Myeloma (MM) and other gammopathies, tumour load, pattern of infiltration are
best appreciated on histological preparations. Immunophenotyping on sections is necessary
in cases of non secreting MM (about 1 % of the cases) and in follow-up of MM patients
(distinction between residual disease and reactive plasma cell population). According to
Bain et al.(1996), non-diagnostic biopsies are obtained in 5-10 % of the cases (early
disease, heterogeneous infiltration) so that aspirate and biopsy should be regarded as
complementary.
The monoclonality of the plasma cell population can be evaluated according to the
" Light-chain Ratio " (LR) (Peterson et al. 1986).
N of plasma cells reacting
for the predominant light-chain
LR = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
N of plasma cells reacting
for the minority light-chain
According to Peterson et al. (1986), a LR of 4 or more corresponds to monoclonality.
In our institution, BMB is also part of the work-up of patients with Monoclonal Gammopathy
of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) at diagnosis and during follow-up (progression to MM).
Search for amyloid deposits (Congo red staining) should be applied on every BMB performed
for gammopathy.
BMB is of diagnostic and prognostic value in the assessment of Chronic
Myeloproliferative Diseases (MPD) at presentation and during follow-up. MPD correspond to a group of clonal
diseases including Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML), Polycythaemia Vera, (PV) Myelofibrosis
with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) (syn.: primary or idiopathic myelofibrosis, agnogenic
myeloid metaplasia) and Essential Thombocythaemia (ET). CML is the only MPD characterized
by a specific chromosomal abnormality (Philadelphia (Phi) Chromosome). Overlapping cases
exist and MMM can supervene during the course of another MPD. BM hyperplasia and fibrosis
are common features in MPD. Aspirate is frequently not obtained. "Dry tap" is
typical for MMM. BM cellularity, distribution of haemopoietic cell lines, quantification
of BM fibrosis and blasts are best appreciated on biopsy.
The diagnosis of MPD is based on a combination of data: clinical status, assessment of PB
and BM smears and BM biopsy, cytogenetics (Phi chromosome in CML) and erythroid cultures
(particularly important in PV).
The Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) represent a group of clonal diseases characterized by
ineffective haemopoiesis. MDS usually present with PB cytopenia of one or several cell
lines with a hyper- or normocellular BM in most cases. The diagnosis of MDS relies on a
combination of data including clinical status, morphologic evaluation of the peripheral
blood (PB) smear, BM aspirate and biopsy as well as cytogenetic analysis. It is often a
diagnosis of exclusion and BMB is necessary to exclude other conditions associated with
cytopenia, such as Aplastic Anaemia (AA) or a metastatic process. About 12 % of MDS
patients present with the hypocellular variant of MDS, thus raising a differential
diagnosis with AA. The use of the FAB classification (1982) on sections has allowed a
better correlation between cytology and biopsy. Over the last fifteen years, the
introduction of BM biopsies in MDS has led to consideration of histological prognostic
parameters such as cellularity, fibrosis, Abnormal Localization of Immature Precursors
(ALIP) and CD34 positive blasts. The negative prognostic impact of histological parameters
such as quantity of blasts, quantity of CD34+ immature cells, marrow fibrosis and ALIP has
been demonstrated.
The differential diagnosis between MDS and MPD may be difficult and overlapping cases
exist, such as Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukaemia (CMML).
In Acute Leukaemia (AL), BMB has to be performed in cases of unsatisfactory aspirates due
to packed and/or fibrotic BM. One of the main roles of the biopsy is to rule out other
malignant tumours involving the BM. In most cases a rough characterization of the blast
cells can be established by IHC, but most often a precise application of the FAB
classification is not possible. Flow cytometry is the most reliable technique to identify
the phenotype of blast cells in AL but a panel of IHC markers can be usefully applied on
BM sections, including TdT, MPO, CD34, CD68, CD79a, FVW.
Precursor lymphoid cells are positive for TdT (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase),
whereas peripheral B- and T- cells are negative for that marker. The histological and
cytological features and immunophenotypes are identical in lymphoblastic lymphomas and
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemias (ALL). The distinction is usually based on the percentage
of lymphoblasts in the marrow at time of diagnosis (25 % of BM blasts correspond to ALL).
Acute non lymphoid (myeloblastic or myelomonocytic) leukaemias (ANLL) are positive for
myeloperoxydase (MPO) and/or for the myelomonocytic marker CD68, whereas lymphoblasts are
regularly negative for MPO.
Aberrant expression of lymphoid markers may be observed in ANLL (e.g. aberrant positivity
for B-cell markers). CD34 and CD45 can be expressed by both lymphoblasts and myeloblasts.
In daily practice, unexplained cytopenia represents one of the major indications for BM
examination. Precise assessment of BM features such as hypocellularity or aplasia (e.g.
aplastic anaemia), hyper-/or normocellularity (e.g. peripheral destruction, hypersplenism,
inefficient haemopoiesis, HIV-positive patients, Myelodysplastic Syndromes), expanding
process in BM (e.g. granulomas, tumour cells, MPD) has to be done on histological
sections.
BMB is part of the routine clinical work-up of haematological and oncological patients.
Optimal interpretation of BMB requires an integrative approach of all available data.
<<< Previous | Index | Next >>> |
Copyright 2001, The Author(s) and/or The Publisher(s)
Organisation: FORPATH asbl |
Coordination: Dr Bernard Van den Heule |
Host: Labo CMP |